The End of Queer Space?
In 1997, Aaron Bet sky published Queer Space: Architecture and Same-Sex Desire. The book worked fiuidly between histories of queerness and design, constructing a lineage of queer space
while also locating sites and geneses of queerness within architecture's disciplinary boundaries. He looked at Serlio, at mirrors, at antiques, and at Charles Moore. He considered decorating, postmodernism, and AIDS (not necessarily together), ultimately developing a story of queer public presence and queer space that,
in the end, considered its possible dissolution. The book was both a celebration and an elegy - and while participating in the spatial approach to queerness that was so dominant at the time, it was also prescient in anticipating the appropriation and deradicalization of queerness by mainstream culture that would occur in the following decades. He introduced concepts like "postindividual" to predict
new forms of social collectivity enabled and invented by the advent of digital networking, and raised points about a range of issues - from collecting to the everyday - that seem particularly relevant in
our postdigital age. Betsky, now president of the School of Architecture at Taliesin, agreed to a Skype conversation in August to track how his thinking
on these topics has changed in the intervening years, giving insight to how the relationship between architecture and queerness has evolved through recent cultural transformations.